NewsApril 18, 2016
COLUMBIA, Mo. -- The University of Missouri is countersuing a law-school professor who has asked a court to invalidate the university's ban on firearms. Royce de R. Barondes' case has the potential to redefine the limits of acceptable gun regulations under Missouri's Constitution, which voters amended in 2014 to make the right to bear arms "unalienable."...
By ADAM ATON ~ Associated Press

COLUMBIA, Mo. -- The University of Missouri is countersuing a law-school professor who has asked a court to invalidate the university's ban on firearms.

Royce de R. Barondes' case has the potential to redefine the limits of acceptable gun regulations under Missouri's Constitution, which voters amended in 2014 to make the right to bear arms "unalienable."

But since his lawyer filed the lawsuit in September in Cole County, the university's team of private lawyers has moved the case to federal court and sought a court order forbidding Barondes from bringing a gun onto campus.

Jennifer Bukowsky, the lawyer representing Barondes, said the university's "aggressive" approach is slowing the case and making it more expensive.

She wants to move on to arguing the merits of Barondes' case, she said, "but they're making it very difficult to get to that point."

Barondes, a tenured professor who teaches a class on firearms law and is licensed to carry a concealed weapon, claimed the university's rules against carrying a weapon on campus violate his rights under the U.S. and state constitutions, as well as a state law that allows public employees to keep guns locked in their cars.

In their court filings, the university's attorneys wrote the board of curators is charged with creating a safe environment, and the rule banning guns is tailored to achieve that objective.

"The right to keep and bear arms under the federal and state constitutions is laudable, but not absolute," they wrote, noting the university includes hospitals, day cares and hosts large events.

They also note the state's laws on concealed weapon permits do not allow people to carry weapons into a higher-education institution without the permission of the governing board.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

But GOP lawmakers are considering changing that. The House is debating a measure that would allow people with a concealed-carry license to take guns to some places on campus.

Republicans have proposed similar measures in the Senate, though they have not advanced since a January committee hearing.

Meanwhile, Bukowsky argues for the board of curators to withhold consent violates Barondes' civil rights.

A spokesman for the University of Missouri System declined to comment other than pointing to the rule prohibiting weapons on university property. A spokesman for the Columbia campus did not return calls requesting comment, nor did the university's lawyers at Bryan Cave's offices in St. Louis and Kansas City.

Courts typically have been hesitant to rewrite gun regulations from the bench, said Gregory Magarian, a professor at Washington University's School of Law.

But the caveat there is that state courts deal with different legal standards than federal courts, he said.

Bukowsky said Barondes is dropping his Second Amendment claims in an effort to bring the case back to state court

Generally speaking, Missouri's 2014 constitutional change makes challenging a gun regulation "substantially more likely to succeed than if you were only going on the Second Amendment," Magarian said.

Both Barondes and the university are seeking to recoup attorney fees and court costs -- though Bukowsky says the possible cost of the university's four attorneys is a daunting expense.

Story Tags

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!