*
The Bottom Line
Melissa Miller

Emerson co-sponsors repeal of Healthcare Reform

Posted Friday, January 7, 2011, at 10:38 AM

Comments

View 8 comments or respond
Community discussion is important, and we encourage you to participate as a reader and commenter. Click here to see our Guidelines. We also encourage registered users to let us know if they see something inappropriate on our site. You can do that by clicking "Report Comment" below.
  • More from our "all for show" legislator. Politics before people.

    -- Posted by Remington on Fri, Jan 7, 2011, at 11:21 AM
  • Amen Remington!

    -- Posted by semogirl on Fri, Jan 7, 2011, at 12:05 PM
  • 800 pound Guerilla? Do you have a dictionary? If you don't really know the term don't use it. And why the upper case "G".

    Might I suggest the concept of editor and proofreader. Many newspapers have used it succesfully, especially when the staff is not highly experienced.

    -- Posted by ParkerDaws on Fri, Jan 7, 2011, at 7:09 PM
    Melissa Miller
    Thanks for noticing the error. It was re result of a spell check auto-correct function. It has been fixed. Just so you know, I am actually not an inexperienced reporter. I graduated from journalism school more than ten years ago an have seven years in newspapers as well as four years in public relations.
  • Then, with all that experience as a reporter and education in journalism you would know:

    -the difference between gorilla and guerilla.

    -the problems with spell check, especially auto-correct function and how it should not be used in journalism.

    -the value of proofreading and proofreading again.

    I am sorry I touched a nerve, but despite all your education and experience your writing could benefit from some mentoring by an editor. IMHO

    -- Posted by ParkerDaws on Fri, Jan 7, 2011, at 8:43 PM
  • The answer is not in "writing a more perfect regulation", or in a federal law.

    Where in the U.S. Constitution does it stipulate that the central government may insist that private insurance companies cannot write policies excluding certain pre-existing conditions? The cost of covering care of those with such conditions will be subsidized by those without. Inexpensive coverage for the younger and healthier will be unavailable. These individuals would like to be in a "low risk" pool, where insurance is statistically unlikely to have to cover expensive care on a frequent basis. Alternatively, the insurance company will have to provide a product solely to a "high risk" pool which will yield no profit. Is this free enterprise? "No profit" is the exclusive domain of the federal government...think Amtrak, USPS, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc.

    Here's a radical idea: let every American have an HSA, and a high deductible catastrophic plan for the huge ticket items (car crash, tornado). That would give the people their control back--because after all, "FREE people can CHOOSE." But that would devolve power downward, which is anathema to anyone in the federal government.

    -- Posted by Givemeliberty on Sat, Jan 8, 2011, at 11:19 AM
  • Sounds like ParkerDaws is volunteering her "skills" to go in to the paper and proofread all of the content being published on the paper's website. I'm sure that is only one or two stories a day. ;)

    -- Posted by SEMissouri70 on Sat, Jan 8, 2011, at 11:39 AM
  • Nope, not volunteering. Should not have to do what the newspaper should be doing as part of their mission. The entire media has just gotten sloppy. But, if you were willing to pay me I would make sure it got done and done right.

    -- Posted by ParkerDaws on Sat, Jan 8, 2011, at 5:54 PM
  • How many years has Joann been in Congress and had the opportunity to address the health care problem? Now she intends to spend her time trying to undo what others have worked hard to acheive.

    -- Posted by ithenana on Sun, Jan 9, 2011, at 7:37 AM