NewsJanuary 21, 2003

GENEVA -- The United Nations' human rights watchdog elected a Libyan diplomat Monday as this year's president, overriding objections from the United States that the country's "horrible" record disqualifies it for such a post. Riding on a wave of African solidarity, Libyan ambassador Najat Al-Hajjaji received votes from 33 countries in her bid to chair the 53-member U.N. Human Rights Commission for its annual session starting in March...

By Alexander G. Higgins, The Associated Press

GENEVA -- The United Nations' human rights watchdog elected a Libyan diplomat Monday as this year's president, overriding objections from the United States that the country's "horrible" record disqualifies it for such a post.

Riding on a wave of African solidarity, Libyan ambassador Najat Al-Hajjaji received votes from 33 countries in her bid to chair the 53-member U.N. Human Rights Commission for its annual session starting in March.

The United States and two other nations voted against her, and 17 abstained.

'Especially sad'

"It is especially sad today when America celebrates the birthday of Martin Luther King, a champion of human rights, that a nation which flaunts human rights abuses would be elected chair," U.S. Ambassador Kevin E. Moley told reporters.

"It is not appropriate for a nation under U.N. sanctions -- a nation with the horrible human rights record that Libya has -- to be chairman of this commission."

To oppose the nomination, the United States had to break with the half-century U.N. tradition of sharing such jobs on a rotating basis among regional groups. Whereas previously each group's choice was accepted by acclamation, the United States insisted Monday on a vote.

Violated practice

"It is regrettable that the United States opted for this method," said South African Ambassador Sipho George Nene. "The previous, reliable practice has been violated."

The African Union put forward the Libyan choice as one of its first decisions last year.

Al-Hajjaji said the U.S. move set "a bad precedent" because it undermined respect for the regional groupings and worsens divisions in the world by labeling countries as "bad guys or good guys."

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

"I don't think there is any country free of human rights violations," she said.

In a gesture of reconciliation, the African group accepted the Libyan ambassador's appeal and withdrew a demand for a tit-for-tat vote on a nomination of a member of the Western group to another post on the commission.

"I will be in a position to cooperate with all the members of the commission," Al-Hajjaji told reporters later. "I will be the chair of all participants here."

Yaakov Levy, Israeli Ambassador to U.N. offices in Geneva, said the selection marked a "descent to a new low in the credibility of the work of the Human Rights Commission."

Although the ballot was secret, the United States immediately told reporters it had voted against her. Canada had already signaled it would join with the United States. Observers said Guatemala also voted against, although there was no immediate confirmation.

Although European nations were dismayed at the nomination, they chose to abstain. Diplomats said this was because Europe didn't want to alienate Africa and other developing countries and undermine the commission's work.

Al-Hajjaji once held the post of vice president, and western diplomats said there were no problems with her impartiality. As president, she would be able to wield some influence over the commission's six-week long meeting, which examines human rights abuses around the world.

Moley said the Libyan government continues to commit serious violations.

Its leader, Moammar Gadhafi, "has detained political opponents for years without trial," Moley said. "Security forces torture and mistreat prisoners. Arbitrary arrests are used to suppress domestic opposition."

The United States and its allies want Libya to accept responsibility for the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over the Scottish village of Lockerbie and to pay compensation to families of the victims.

The U.N. Security Council imposed sanctions against Libya because of the Lockerbie attack, but suspended them several years ago.

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!