After Iraq, where will United States seek weapons?

To the editor:

This is for all the people who are celebrating over George Bush's call to attack Iraq and get rid of Saddam Hussein. So now what?

This war is far from over. Maybe the big bombs have stopped dropping, but it is not over. Now the president and some members of his warmongers party may think about attacking Syria (which still has close ties with Israel). Wouldn't that cause major problems for the Jewish communities here in the United States?

It would be a mistake to start attacking other countries just because we believe they may have chemical weapons. We have yet to find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet.

Attacking any other country right now without being provoked by them would not only be immoral, but would truly be looked upon as an act of aggression. What country is next?. Is this president ever satisfied with wasting money and being as close as to a dictator we have ever seen?

KEVIN WADE

Jackson