NewsApril 2, 2017

BOSTON — A Massachusetts man who sued a pair of Dunkin’ Donuts owners because he said he was given a butter substitute when he asked for real butter on his bagel has won a settlement. The Boston Globe reported Jan Polanik’s suits name two companies that together own more than 20 stores...

Associated Press

BOSTON — A Massachusetts man who sued a pair of Dunkin’ Donuts owners because he said he was given a butter substitute when he asked for real butter on his bagel has won a settlement.

The Boston Globe reported Jan Polanik’s suits name two companies that together own more than 20 stores.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

Polanik’s lawyer, Thomas Shapiro, acknowledged his client’s complaint is “a minor thing,” but they decided to sue “to stop the practice of representing one thing and selling a different thing.”

Shapiro did not disclose the settlement’s terms, because it hasn’t yet been filed with the court.

An attorney for one franchisee confirms the case has been settled and the stores have changed their butter-serving protocol. A spokesman for the other franchisee could not be reached.

Story Tags

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!