New York's new abortion law is beyond despicable. Really, how else can we describe it? Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who set this in motion, and the lawmakers who sanctioned it should be ashamed -- and those who voted for them should be experiencing deep regret.
Abortion is sad enough. Life is life -- whether in the womb or outside of the womb, whether at one month or nine. But when ending the innocent life of someone fully formed is legal, when it is applauded -- literally, when elected officials grin like Cheshire cats for this "win" for women's rights, when One World Trade Center is lit up in pink to celebrate it, "despicable" comes closest in description. I'm not calling the individuals responsible despicable. Rather, they are deceived and blinded, and the result of their delusion is this despicable law, which sacrifices innocent life on the altars of "progression."
So what actually is contained in New York's Reproductive Health Act? Journalist Penny Starr, in her article "8 Shocking Facts About New York's Radical Abortion Law," writes:
Here are eight facts about New York's new abortion law:
Read Starr's full article here: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/24/8-shocking-facts-about-new-yorks-radical-abortion-law/.
Each of these is appalling, but zone in on the fact that a baby may be aborted at any time -- even just prior to birth! My friend just had a baby whom she had to deliver early. She shared a photograph. I looked at her beautiful newborn, and it hit me: Aubrey Faye -- all 6 pounds, 13 ounces and 19.25 inches of her--could have been aborted a second before entering the world. Mind-boggling. Despicable.
This law also means a baby born alive after a botched abortion may be placed on a shelf somewhere, without medical care, left to die. It's horrifying, yet you and I are told to sit down and shut up because, "Who are you to judge?" Really?
The law also shines a light on the hypocrisy of the so-called progressive women's movement: A pregnant woman who is attacked and loses her baby cannot seek legal justice for homicide because her unborn baby is not a "person." Starr writes, "'Person,' when referring to the victim of a homicide, means a human being who has been born and is alive, the law states." If this ain't enough to snuff the life out of a mother! This will kill a woman quicker than anything. Why aren't the #MeToo-ers and the Pussyhat-wearers and the I Am Woman! Hear Me Roar-ers ripping and roaring over this? If ever there was something to scream about, this is it -- that a man can attack a woman, killing her child, yet she has no legal power because that child is not a person, according to the emperor-gods of the Empire State. This is low--even for liberal, progressive New York.
I'm a native New Yorker, lived there all of my life until just a few years ago, but I am embarrassed, ashamed and appalled by this legislation. This isn't progression. This is regression. This is some nightmare from which we must pray to awake. Maybe I'm gullible, but I have to believe that even those who are pro-choice recognize this as beyond the pale, wicked and, yes, downright despicable. God, have mercy on our souls -- and God, please have mercy on the most vulnerable souls among us: our precious babies.
Adrienne Ross is owner of Adrienne Ross Communications and a former Southeast Missourian editorial board member. Contact her at aross@semissourian.com.
Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:
For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.