OpinionMay 15, 2001

How dare Ted Olson thwart Al Gore's attempted coup of the presidency? Well, for some Democrats, it's now payback time. Senate Democrats are refusing to confirm Washington super-lawyer Ted Olson as solicitor general if Democrats can call their chief lobbyists with law degrees super-lawyers, I'm certainly within bounds to call a real lawyer a super-lawyer...

How dare Ted Olson thwart Al Gore's attempted coup of the presidency?

Well, for some Democrats, it's now payback time.

Senate Democrats are refusing to confirm Washington super-lawyer Ted Olson as solicitor general if Democrats can call their chief lobbyists with law degrees super-lawyers, I'm certainly within bounds to call a real lawyer a super-lawyer.

The news media are doing all they can to block Olson as well. Olson's principal sin was leading the Bush legal team against Gore's 36 days of legal hell in Florida.

U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont has dredged up an old bogus allegation against Olson. Leahy wants to revisit charges that Olson was involved in the Arkansas Project, an investigation by the American Spectator magazine into the criminal activities of the Clintons.

Now, right on cue, the Beltway media are trying to revive this matter. On May 10, The Washington Post ran an extensive piece examining whether Olson was sufficiently forthcoming in his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee about his involvement in the Arkansas Project.

Hold on just a minute here. The Post is asking the wrong question.

The issue is not the candor of Olson about the Arkansas Project, but why the Post isn't reporting that there's nothing to this story in the first place.

The government's investigation of the Arkansas Project is another example of the Clinton administration, with the complicity of the abysmal Reno Justice Department, demonizing its accusers.

Let me give you the highlights:

On Aug. 9, 1998, deputy attorney general Eric Holder suggested that independent counsel Kenneth Starr initiate an investigation into allegations that conservative philanthropist Richard Mellon Scaife indirectly paid David Hale to testify against Bill Clinton in the Whitewater investigation. Scaife allegedly channeled the money through the American Spectator magazine by helping to fund its Arkansas Project.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

It gets crazier.

The main source of the allegations was a fortune-teller, a dabbler in the occult, who claimed that her former boyfriend, Parker Dozhier -- a research assistant for the Arkansas project -- paid Hale $5,000 at the time he was cooperating with Starr in his Whitewater investigation. Both Hale and Dozhier denied that any payments were made and countered that the fortune-teller was an ardent Democrat given to wild fantasies and bent on ruining Dozhier.

Holder attempted to dissuade Starr from conducting the investigation himself, implying that he had a conflict of interest "because of the importance of Hale to your investigation and because the payments allegedly came from funds provided by Richard Scaife." Holder encouraged Starr to have the Justice Department investigate. Clinton's attorney and snapping turtle David Kendall piled on and demanded that Starr refer the matter back to Justice.

Now, here's the rest of the story -- something you won't read in the mainstream Clinton press.

Ultimately, neither Starr nor Reno investigated the matter. Reno appointed former Justice official Michael E. Shaheen Jr. to conduct an independent investigation. He did, and there was no "there" there. In a 168-page report released on July 28, 1999, Shaheen exonerated all of the accused.

It was wrong for Clinton and Reno to launch an investigation into this non-story in the first place. It was wrong for them not to apologize to the accused (and to the nation) once an investigation cleared them, including Olson, Starr and the American Spectator.

It was wrong for Janet Reno to inform Starr that she was going to investigate him just four days before his scheduled impeachment testimony before Congress.

It was wrong for the Justice Department to deliberately leak to the media that this investigation was under way. It was wrong for the media to suppress the results of the special investigation vindicating the wrongly accused.

And, it is particularly outrageous for Senator Leahy and other Democrats to attempt to resurrect this issue now.

Olson committed the unforgivable sin of effectively criticizing Bill Clinton's endless misconduct in office. He compounded that sin by thrashing David Boies and the rest of Gore's legal army, thereby formally ending the Clinton-Gore-Reno reign of injustice.

The Democrats put their best legal minds up against Olson, and he trounced them. One would think that even they should acknowledge his prowess and get behind his nomination. But to them, as usual, politics trumps the cause of justice.

~David Limbaugh is a Cape Girardeau lawyer, author and syndicated columnist.

Story Tags

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!