FeaturesMarch 17, 2002

PORTLAND, Ore. -- Wine maker Michael Paul Higgins is whining about his license plate. Oregon's Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division has rejected his request to have WINE, VINO or IN VINO as a vanity plate, a move Higgins says violates his constitutional right to free speech...

The Associated Press

PORTLAND, Ore. -- Wine maker Michael Paul Higgins is whining about his license plate.

Oregon's Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division has rejected his request to have WINE, VINO or IN VINO as a vanity plate, a move Higgins says violates his constitutional right to free speech.

"Why shouldn't people be able to put anything on a vanity plate that they can put on a bumper sticker?" he asks.

The state Supreme Court will hear the case.

Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!

Experts say a victory by Higgins would eliminate virtually any restrictions on vanity plates, forcing Oregon officials to choose between allowing nasty words and scrapping a program that raises about $1.5 million a year for litter patrol.

Higgins' request for the plates was first denied in 1996 and an appeal lost the next year.

In 2000, a divided Oregon Court of Appeals sided with the DMV, saying vanity plates were not the speech of the motorist who requested them, but of the government.

Higgins, 65, said the reasoning is ludicrous. "If someone walks down the street and swears up a blue streak, it doesn't make us think that the state approves it because it's a public street," he said last week.

Story Tags

Connect with the Southeast Missourian Newsroom:

For corrections to this story or other insights for the editor, click here. To submit a letter to the editor, click here. To learn about the Southeast Missourian’s AI Policy, click here.

Advertisement
Receive Daily Headlines FREESign up today!